Oh Spinner of fabricated excrement

BANGOR CAVE - The divisions have not been in existence that long.  The analogy you proudly pontificated is equal to the NCAA putting Michigan, Texas, Alabama and Notre Dame in a conference and proudly proclaiming the new entity as the greatest conference of all time.  Historically, these teams may have won many championships but, since the inception of the new alignment, as a whole, they have NOT dominated in anything except folding when the cards are down (and changing coaches as often as the GBD refills their Viagra prescription)!

Also (while staying with the collegiate theme), over the last few years, USC has dominated college football while the remainder of the conference has thrown up big scores while bending over when playing a team of substance or when the chips were down.  Does the dominance of one team (USC) make the PAC-10 the dominant conference?  HELL NO, the SEC, who scraps, kicks, claws and WINS when it counts is easily the hands down dominant force.

Wins and losses determine championships, if points alone dictated who is crowned, then the playoff system can be scrapped and a champion can be crowned after week 17.  Even before the playoff system was initiated, imaginary bowl games were played with the WINNER of the Big Daddy bowl (not the teams who scored the most points throughout the season) having bragging rights (with or without an *).

In a token offer to allow the sagging curmudgeons something to boast about, I will concede that in the 2006 season, the sad sack geezers had the dubious honor of having the most individual champions to NOT make the big dance!

Spin, Spin, Spin Away.  If you think hard enough, I am confident that you can find some obscure data that can be spun to reinforce whatever delusional ideology is needed to justify the powder puff's existence.  Serious note, you have a gift.  If you ever decide to enter politics, you would be a shoe-in for the chief spin-master position (Hillary could certainly use your talents)!